- RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS FOR MAC
- RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS PRO
- RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS PLUS
Some of these features I'm already using and are the same or similar to those currently in Cubase. I visited the Steinberg website to learn about the new release features (see later). For me, Nuendo has a ton of tricks and tools up its sleeve that I know that I can turn to when needed, but they're not in my face or forcing me to work any differently than I normally would. But in today's record-making environment, the reality is that balance is always the key, so I will use any tool that can get the project to be the best creative representation of the artist and song.
RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS PLUS
I would rather work with the artist to get a great performance than to manufacture one from pieces, and I rarely do any drum replacement or augmentation, plus I don't really tune vocals unless absolutely needed for a few notes that might otherwise impact a great performance.
When recording or mixing, I have generally preferred projects that work with more audio than sound design components. I have always had a linear approach to DAW production –using it more like a tape machine with the added benefit of great editing and audio processing, rather than as a heavy MIDI or virtual instrument tool. The appearance and functionality of both DAWs are the same, but Nuendo 10 is the pinnacle release of the Steinberg DAW set for me, with all the music production features of Cubaseplus a little more. Needless to say, Cubase is geared towards music production while Nuendo includes features for post-production. In that review, I also touched on the evolutionary change of Cubase versus Nuendo, and the version numbers as they leap-frogged each other, so I won't readdress that subject here.
RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS PRO
During the course of reviewing Cubase Pro 10, I dug into a few of the more Cubase-specific workflows and features that I didn't know much about or use often. The product has grown and evolved over the years, along with mixing requirements, which makes it is hard to track changes or note new features through the passing of time. The decision to use Nuendo as my main recording and mixing software has served me very well, and Steinberg has improved their resampling quality with this release for even better sounding audio. I am very particular about everything in the audio path and cannot tolerate average (or merely acceptable) quality for my clients.
Contrary to the beliefs of some, all DAWs do not sound alike. At the time, Nuendo's biggest draws were that I was not required to use any dedicated/proprietary hardware for I/O or processing, there were no track count limitations, and it had superior sonic integrity.
RECORDING MIXING AND MASTERING SOFTWARE REVIEWS FOR MAC
I began using Nuendo v1.5 in 2000 when it was first released for Mac OS. Where to start a review of a product or software is especially tricky when you have been working with it for almost 20 years.
0 kommentar(er)
